Posts Tagged ‘america’

Just in case America isn't fat enough…

September 21st, 2009

taco bell fourth meal

As the debate over President Obama’s healthcare proposal rages on, Taco Bell continues to give Americans exactly what they crave….melty, crunchy, spicy and heart attack inducing.

I especially love the tagline at the end…

taco bell it's not just food fourth meal

Of course, I would change it just a little bit.

taco bell not real food

.

If you like what you see here, click here for updates

.

Related Posts

Popularity: 1% [?]

Healthcare: Canada v.s the U.S.A.

July 13th, 2009

According to the  USA Today, President Obama has begun his health care push.

child medicineAnd you know what that means.

Like it or not, President Obama wants to give you a great big taste of Canadian style healthcare.

So, I thought that I would take a few minutes to let you know a little bit about my experience with the Canadian health care system.

  1. It is a massive (government) bureaucracy that eats up a lot of money and can frustrate the people who rely upon it.
  2. It’s full of hardworking doctors/nurses/technicians/etc who work long hours trying to keep sick people from dying
  3. It’s seems to work fairly effectively – according to the CIA, Canadian life expectancy is 81.23 yrs. (#8 in the world)

So, let’s compare that to the current American health care system.

  1. It is a massive (medical insurance) bureaucracy that eats up a lot of money and can frustrate the people who rely upon it.
  2. It’s full of hardworking doctors/nurses/technicians/etc who work long hours trying to keep sick people from dying
  3. It’s seems to work fairly effectively – according to the CIA, American life expectancy is 78.11 yrs. (#50 in the world)

Hmmm, seems pretty similar to me.

Except of course, the Canadian system is a public health care system. And everyone knows that a public system is essentially socialist, which is another word for communist, and dammit, no way is America going to have a communist health care system.

wow

I got a little excited there…sorry about that.

But seriously, other than this political/ideological argument, what are the differences between our two systems of health care?

1. Quantity of Life (longevity): We all want to live a long life. And without nitpicking, it looks like both countries are doing pretty good at increasing longevity.

Let’s call quantity of life a tie.

2.   Quality of Life: This one is a little trickier. Is there a difference between the general health & vitality of Canadians and Americans? According to all of the latest studies, both nations are growing more fat and less fit year after year. And as far as I can see, both of our health care systems are based on treating illness instead of  preventing illness.

fat couple exercise

So, once again, let’s call this a tie…both countries stink.

3.   Cost: In 2006, per-capita spending for health care in the U.S. was US$6,714; in Canada, US$3,678. (dollar amounts adjusted for purchasing power parity)

healthcare costs

Winner: Canada

And now for a personal story.

My wife blew out her back a few months ago…by sneezing.

I’m not kidding. Excrutiating pain, incapacitation, inability to work, sleep, sit, etc….

So, how did we deal with it?

Because of our personal experience with acute injuries such as my wife’s bad back, we knew that treatment needed to begin as soon as possible.We did not want this acute injury to become a chronic injury.

And that is the biggest problem with Canada’s public health care system. SPEED of SERVICE. Acute injuries become chronic injuries.

So, instead of going through the normal channels (go see the family doc, get an x-ray, wait for a consult, start public-pay physio, etc…), we began a series of physical therapy treatment – chiro, massage, acupuncture, laser and finally osteopathic. All on our dime. Yes, this is possible in socialist Canada.

We also made an appointment (the next day) with our publicly funded sports medicine doctor. Great guy, lots of experience working with professional athletes. And while my wife isn’t exactly an athlete, we like the fact that they focus on optimum health not just pain management.

At the sports medicine doc, my wife was assessed and given an x-ray at the first appointment.(public pay)

The x-ray showed nothing wrong…Yippee!!!

The next step was a requisition for an MRI. Here’s where it get’s interesting.

If we had followed the “normal” procedure, my wife would be getting her MRI in late November.

However, because my wife is in a lot of pain and is a pro-active kind of gal, she made a few phone calls, day after day and less than 2 weeks later, she had her MRI. (public pay)

Supposedly, this is impossible in the Canadian health care system. When I tell people that we got an MRI in 2 weeks, they don’t believe it. They have bought into the mind virus that Canadians are supposed to wait in line like a good little socialist patients and wait their turn.  Like sheep.

So, what’s the moral of the story?

The Canadian health care system isn’t perfect. But neither is the American system.

  • Wait times in Canada can be longer than in the U.S.
  • Medical expenses are the #1 cause of bankruptcies in the U.S. (Pre-Recession stats) That doesn’t happen in Canada.
  • Both systems ignore disease prevention
  • Both systems spend huge amounts of money trying to save very old, very sick patients
  • In a large part, the Canadian system is run by our government
  • In comparison, the American system is run by insurance companies

Pick your poison…I mean medicine.

.

If you like what you see here, click here for updates

.

Related Posts

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/12/AR2009071201921.html

Popularity: 1% [?]

Happy Independence Day

July 4th, 2009

american-flag

Happy Independence Day America!!!

Popularity: 1% [?]

Health Care and the Obama Economic Stimulus Bill

February 5th, 2009
presidentialcomics.com

Image: presidentialcomics.com

Americans elected Barack Obama as their president because of their hope that he can bring about real change in Washington.

And according to his blueprint for change, re-building the American health care system is going to be a large part of that change.

obama-healthcare

His plan for re-building the healthcare system has three main planks.

  • To make health insurance affordable and accessible to all:The Obama-Biden plan provides affordable, accessible health care for all Americans, builds on the existing health care system, and uses existing providers, doctors and plans to implement the plan.
  • To lower your health care costs:The Obama plan will lower health care costs by $2,500 for a typical family by investing in health information technology, prevention and care coordination.
  • To promote public health:Obama and Biden will require coverage of preventive services, including cancer screenings, and will increase state and local preparedness for terrorist attacks and natural disasters.

And, unlike previous administrations, it seems like some of these promises may actually be kept.

In the economic stimulus package making it’s way from bill to law, President Obama has earmarked billions and billions of dollars for:

  • State fiscal relief through Medicaid

In this part of the plan, states would receive a temporary (27 months) increase in Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) funding. The estimated cost of this plan is $87 billion.

  • Help for working families hurt by the economic downturn

The stimulus bill would help workers and their families hurt by the economic downturn by providing the following:

  • A 65 percent premium subsidy for individuals who lost their jobs after September to help cover the cost of COBRA premiums. This provision is estimated to cost $25 billion over ten years.
  • A temporary extension of Transitional Medical Assistance (TMA) This provision is estimated to cost $1.3 billion over ten years.
  • A temporary extension of the Qualified Individual (QI) program. This provision is estimated to cost $562 million.
  • An elimination of cost-sharing (co-payments) for American Indians and Alaska Natives in Medicaid. The estimated cost of this provision is $25 million
  • Job-creation in the Health Information Technology (HIT) Industry

This part of the plan focuses on the nationwide conversion of all health care records from paper based filing systems to an electronic system. This provisions is estimated to cost $17.9 billion and is supposed to create about 200,000 new jobs.

Whew!

That’s a lot of stimulus.

By my estimate, the health care portion of the stimulus bill is $130 billion. Of course we need to keep in mind that these numbers are only estimates. Who knows what the final numbers will actually end up at.

But, it’s health care.

That’s a good place to spend money, right?

We all want to live long and healthy lives.

And, considering that the current generation of American children are expected to die at a younger age than their parents, maybe America should move towards a Canadian or European model of health care.

fat-kids

Or maybe, instead of spending 96% of it’s health care dollars on treatments and only 4% on disease prevention, America could shift some money towards making itself fit and healthy.

And if Jim Riesberg, chairman of the House Health and Human Services Committee, has his way, that may actually happen.

As the chairman of the House Health and Human Services Committee, I will spend much of my time this year focusing on health care needs and our health care delivery systems. One of the first places we must begin is to recognize the impact that chronic diseases have on health and health care in the United States.

Chronic diseases are the No. 1 cause of death and disability in the United States.

One hundred thirty-three million Americans, representing 45 percent of the total population, have at least one chronic disease and chronic diseases kill more than 1.7 million Americans per year and are responsible for 7 of 10 deaths in the United States.

Patients with chronic diseases account for 75 percent of the nation’s health care spending.

During 2005, the United States spent almost $2 trillion on health care, and of every dollar spent, 75 cents went toward treating patients with chronic disease. In public programs, treatment of patients with chronic diseases constitutes an even higher portion of spending: more than 96 cents in Medicare and 83 cents in Medicaid. Neither our nation nor our state can effectively address escalating health care costs without addressing the problem of chronic diseases.

Two-thirds of the increase in health care spending is due to increased prevalence of treated chronic disease.

From 1987-2000 that increase amounted to $211 billion among the non-institutionalized U.S. population.

The doubling of obesity between 1987 and today accounts for nearly 30 percent of the rise in health care spending.

The percent of children and youth who are overweight has tripled since 1980.

If the prevalence of obesity was the same today as 1987, health care spending in the United States would be 10 percent lower per person — about $200 billion less.

The vast majority of cases of chronic disease could be better prevented or managed.

Link to entire speechpdf version

In my next post, I will outline some of the disease prevention/health promotion strategies being tested around the world.

.

If you like what you see here, click here for updates

.

Related Posts

Reference

Popularity: 2% [?]

Top Sites Fitness